The Standard Engine.
MathematicsFinanceHealthPhysicsEngineeringBrowse all

Health & Medicine · Biometrics

Ideal Weight Calculator

Calculate your ideal body weight using the Devine formula based on height and sex, with comparisons to Robinson, Miller, and Hamwi formulas.

Calculator

Advertisement

Formula

IBW is Ideal Body Weight in kilograms. H_in is the person's height in inches. For males, the base weight is 50 kg; for females, 45.5 kg. For every inch above 5 feet (60 inches), 2.3 kg is added.

Source: Devine BJ. Gentamicin therapy. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1974;8:650–655.

How it works

Ideal body weight formulas are linear equations that use height as the primary predictor of a healthy target weight, with separate baseline values for males and females. The concept dates to the early 20th century but was formalized for clinical use in the 1960s and 1970s. Unlike BMI, which is a ratio of weight to height squared, IBW formulas produce a single weight target rather than a range, making them especially useful in pharmacokinetic drug dosing, mechanical ventilation settings, and nutritional support planning.

The Devine formula (1974) is the most widely used in clinical practice, particularly for calculating drug dosages in renal impairment. It sets a base of 50 kg for males and 45.5 kg for females at 5 feet, adding 2.3 kg per inch above that baseline. The Robinson formula (1983) was derived from life insurance actuarial data and uses slightly different constants. The Miller formula (1983), published in the same year as Robinson's, used a different dataset and yields higher estimates for shorter individuals. The Hamwi formula (1964), one of the earliest, is commonly taught in dietetic training and uses 2.7 kg per inch increments for males.

Comparing results across all four formulas gives a realistic weight range rather than a single prescriptive number. The average of all four formulas is displayed as a consensus estimate. It is important to understand that these formulas do not account for body composition, muscle mass, bone density, or individual metabolic variation. They are best used as clinical reference tools or starting points for conversation with a healthcare provider rather than strict personal weight goals.

Worked example

Consider a female who is 165 cm tall. First, convert height to inches: 165 ÷ 2.54 = 64.96 inches. The excess above 60 inches (5 feet) is 64.96 − 60 = 4.96 inches.

Devine: 45.5 + (2.3 × 4.96) = 45.5 + 11.41 = 56.9 kg
Robinson: 49 + (1.7 × 4.96) = 49 + 8.43 = 57.4 kg
Miller: 53.1 + (1.36 × 4.96) = 53.1 + 6.75 = 59.9 kg
Hamwi: 45.4 + (2.27 × 4.96) = 45.4 + 11.26 = 56.7 kg

The average across all four formulas is (56.9 + 57.4 + 59.9 + 56.7) ÷ 4 = 57.7 kg. This individual's ideal weight range is approximately 56.7–59.9 kg, with a consensus estimate of 57.7 kg. In pounds, this is approximately 125–132 lbs, which can serve as a meaningful clinical reference point.

Limitations & notes

All four IBW formulas were derived from predominantly Western, adult populations and may not generalize accurately to individuals of Asian, African, or other ethnic backgrounds who often have different body composition profiles at equivalent heights. The formulas apply only to adults over 18 and are not valid for children, pregnant individuals, or highly muscular athletes, for whom body weight relative to height may be significantly elevated without any health risk. Additionally, these equations do not account for age-related changes in lean body mass, bone density, or fat distribution, meaning the same IBW target at age 25 may not be appropriate at age 65. For individuals under 5 feet tall, the formulas can produce very low or even negative results and should not be used directly. Always interpret IBW results alongside other biometric measures such as BMI, waist circumference, and body fat percentage, and consult a qualified healthcare professional before using these values to inform dietary or medical decisions.

Frequently asked questions

Which ideal weight formula is most accurate?

No single formula is universally most accurate, as each was derived from a different dataset and intended for a specific clinical purpose. The Devine formula is the most widely adopted in clinical pharmacokinetics, while the Robinson formula is often considered more reliable for general population use because it was derived from larger actuarial data. Reviewing the range produced by all four formulas together generally provides a more meaningful estimate than any single value alone.

Is ideal body weight the same as a healthy BMI weight?

Not exactly. IBW formulas generate a single point estimate, while a healthy BMI range of 18.5–24.9 produces a weight range for the same height. For many people, the IBW from the Devine or Robinson formula falls near the lower end of the healthy BMI range. Using both tools together provides a more complete picture of a reasonable target weight.

Can I use this calculator if I am under 5 feet tall?

The standard IBW formulas were validated for individuals 5 feet (152 cm) and taller, and they can produce unreliably low results for shorter individuals since they extrapolate below the 60-inch baseline. For individuals shorter than 152 cm, alternative approaches such as BMI-based weight targets or body surface area calculations may be more appropriate. A healthcare provider or registered dietitian can offer guidance tailored to your specific measurements.

Why does the calculator use biological sex rather than gender?

The IBW formulas use biological sex because the baseline weight constants were derived from physiological differences in average skeletal mass and lean body mass between people assigned male or female at birth. These are population-level statistical relationships rather than individual assessments of identity. Individuals who have undergone hormonal transition may find that neither set of constants perfectly reflects their current physiology and should consult a clinician for an individualized assessment.

How is ideal body weight used in clinical medicine?

IBW is used primarily in three clinical contexts: drug dosing (especially for medications with narrow therapeutic windows like aminoglycoside antibiotics and digoxin), mechanical ventilation tidal volume calculation (where lung size correlates with height rather than actual body weight), and enteral or parenteral nutrition planning. Using actual body weight in these scenarios can lead to over- or under-dosing in obese or underweight patients, making IBW a critical correction factor in hospital care.

Last updated: 2025-01-15 · Formula verified against primary sources.